Currently browsing: Items authored or edited by Paul Catley

Ligthart, Sjors; Ienca, Marcello; Meynen, Gerben; Molnar-Gabor, Fruzsina; Andorno, Roberto; Bublitz, Christoph; Catley, Paul; Claydon, Lisa; Douglas, Thomas; Farahany, Nita; Fins, Joseph J; Goering, Sara; Haselager, Pim; Jotterand, Fabrice; Lavazza, Andrea; McCay, Allan; Wajnerman Paz, Abel; Rainey, Stephen; Ryberg, Jesper and Kellmeyer, Philipp (2023). Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of 'Neurorights'. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 32(4) pp. 461–481.

• Download Published Version (PDF / 392kB)

Catley, Paul and Claydon, Lisa (2023). Why neuroscience changes some things but not everything for the law. In: Swaab, Hanna and Meynen, Gerben eds. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Volume 197. Elsevier, pp. 251–264.

Claydon, Lisa and Catley, Paul (2021). Thoughts on the Insanity Defence. In: Brożek, Bartosz; Hage, Jaap and Vincent, Nicole eds. Law and Mind: A Survey of Law and the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge University Press, pp. 342–350.

Catley, Paul; Pywell, Stephanie and Tanner, Adam (2021). End-of-life Decisions for Patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness in England and Wales: Time for Neuroscience-informed Improvements. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30(1) pp. 73–89.

• Download Accepted Manuscript (PDF / 329kB)

Catley, P. (2021). The Need for a Partial Defence of Diminished Capacity and the Potential Role of the Cognitive Sciences in Helping Frame That Defence. In: Ligthart, S.; van Toor, D.; Kooijmans, T.; Douglas, T. and Meynen, G. eds. Neurolaw. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 51–75.

Catley, Paul (2019). Personality Change, Criminal Responsibility and Diminished Capacity. In: Waltermann, Antonia; Roef, David; Hage, Jaap and Jelicic, Marko eds. Law, Science, Rationality. Maastricht Law Series, 14. Utrecht, Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing, pp. 177–208.

• Download Accepted Manuscript (PDF / 362kB)

Claydon, Lisa and Catley, Paul (2017). If a brain can be caught lying, should we admit that evidence to court? Here’s what legal experts think.

Catley, Paul (2017). Abolishing Insanity: Proposals from England and Wales. In: White, Mark. D. ed. The Insanity Defense: Multidisciplinary Views on Its History, Trends, and Controversies. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, pp. 273–305.

Claydon, Lisa and Catley, Paul (2016). Abolishing the Insanity Verdict in England and Wales: A Better Balance between Legal Rules and Scientific Understanding? In: Moratti, Sofia and Patterson, Dennis eds. Legal Insanity and the Brain: Science, Law and European Courts. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 207–237.

• Download Accepted Manuscript (PDF / 597kB)

Catley, Paul (2016). The Future of Neurolaw. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22(2), article no. 487.

• Download Published Version (PDF / 352kB)

Catley, Paul (2016). Understanding how the brain works and its implications for the Law.

Catley, Paul and Claydon, Lisa (2015). The use of neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom by those accused of criminal offenses in England and Wales. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3) pp. 510–549.

• Download Published Version (PDF / 598kB)

Catley, Paul and Pywell, Stephanie (2015). The ethical imperative of ascertaining and respecting the wishes of the minimally conscious patient facing a life-or-death decision. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik, 19 pp. 77–90.

• Download Accepted Manuscript (PDF / 92kB)

Catley, Paul (2014). Online formative MCQs to supplement traditional teaching: a very significant positive impact on student performance in the short and long run. Brookes E-Journal of Learning and Teaching, 6(1)

• Download Published Version (PDF / 827kB)

Claydon, Lisa and Catley, Paul (2011). Neuroscientific evidence in the English courts. In: Spranger, Tade Matthias ed. International Neurolaw: A Comparative Analysis. Bonn: Springer, pp. 305–328.