Currently browsing: Items authored or edited by Jim Turner https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8103-5202

Munro, James; Motson, Fred; Turner, Jim; Frumkin, Lara A. and Curley, Lee John (2024). Double jeopardy: The effects of retrial knowledge on juror decisions. Journal of Criminal Psychology (Early access).

• Download Accepted Manuscript (PDF / 263kB)

Lazard, Lisa; Capdevila, Rose and Turner, Jim (2023). Calling it out? A Q Methodological Study of Sexual Harassment Labelling. Violence Against Women (Early access).

• Download Published Version (PDF / 280kB)

Curley, Lee John; Munro, James; Turner, Jim; Frumkin, Lara A.; Jackson, Elaine and Lages, Martin (2022). Proven and not proven: A potential alternative to the current Scottish verdict system. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 40(3) pp. 452–466.

• Download Published Version (PDF / 445kB)

Curley, Lee; Munro, James; Frumkin, Lara and Turner, Jim (2021). Informing Reform: The views of legal professionals on the unique aspects of Scottish Law. Medicine, Science and the Law, 61(4) pp. 256–265.

• Download Published Version (PDF / 396kB)

Pike, Graham; Brace, Nicola; Turner, Jim; Ness, Hayley and Vredeveldt, Annelies (2019). Advances in Facial Composite Technology, Utilizing Holistic Construction, Do Not Lead to an Increase in Eyewitness Misidentifications Compared to Older Feature-Based Systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article no. 1962.

• Download Published Version (PDF / 405kB)

Pike, Graham E.; Brace, Nicola A.; Turner, Jim and Vredeveldt, Annelies (2019). The Effect of Facial Composite Construction on Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in an Ecologically Valid Paradigm. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(2) pp. 319–336.

• Download Published Version (PDF / 131kB)

Briggs, Gemma F. and (2018). The impact of attentional set and situation awareness on dual tasking driving performance. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 57 pp. 36–47.

• Download Accepted Manuscript (PDF / 474kB)

Turner, Jim and Briggs, Gemma (2018). To see or not to see? Comparing the effectiveness of examinations and end of module assessments in online distance learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7) pp. 1048–1060.

• Download Accepted Manuscript (PDF / 375kB)

Turner, Jim and Briggs, Gemma (2017). Using third-party audio-visual materials in module production: learning design, cost effectiveness and student satisfaction on DD210 and DE200. OU Scholarship Exchange.

• Request a copy from the author This file is not available for public download

Briggs, Gemma and Turner, Jim (2017). To see or not to see? The effectiveness of seen and unseen exams and end of module assessments in level 2 psychology modules. OU Scholarship Exchange.

• Request a copy from the author This file is not available for public download

Turner, Jim (2016). Does making a facial composite contaminate witness memory? Ecological validity and framing an innocent suspect. In: European Association of Psychology and Law Conference (EAPL 2016), 5-8 Jul 2016, Toulouse, France.

Briggs, Gemma; Turner, Jim and Pike, Graham (2016). Testing the weapon focus effect: change blindness and eyewitness identification. In: European Association of Psychology and Law Conference (EAPL 2016), 5-8 Jul 2016, Toulouse, France.

Turner, Jim (2015). Believing the TV: Perceptions of crime fiction as a possible basis for the 'CSI Effect'. In: European Association of Psychology and Law Conference (EAPL 2015), 4-7 Aug 2015, Nuremberg, Germany.

Turner, Jim (2012). The ‘CSI Effect’: Are potential jurors sensitive to the (un)realism of fictional forensic evidence? In: European Association of Psychology and Law Conference 2012 (EAPL 2012), 10-13 Apr 2012, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Turner, Jim (2011). Exploring the CSI Effect: What do potential jurors think they know about forensic evidence? In: Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition conference 2011 (SARMAC 2011), 27-29 Jun 201, New York City, USA.

Pike, Graham; Brace, Nicola; Briggs, Gemma and Turner, Jim (2009). Comparing types of sequential lineups. In: The 8th Biennial Conference of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 26-30 Jul 2009, Kyoto, Japan.

Brace, Nicola; Pike, Graham; Turner, Jim and Briggs, Gemma (2009). Change blindness during an identification parade. In: The 8th Biennial Conference of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 26-30 Jul 2009, Kyoto, Japan.

Turner, Jim; Briggs, Gemma; Pike, Graham and Brace, Nicola (2009). Can composite construction contaminate witness memory? In: The 8th Biennial Conference of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 26-30 Jul 2009, Kyoto, Japan.

Brace, Nicola A.; Pike, Graham E.; Kemp, Richard I. and Turner, Jim (2009). Eye-witness identification procedures and stress: a comparison of live and video identification parades. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 11(2) pp. 183–192.

• Request a copy from the author This file is not available for public download

Brace, Nicola A.; Pike, Graham E. and Turner, Jim A. (2008). Holistic facial composite systems: are they compatible with witness recall? Cognitive Technology Journal, 13(2) pp. 42–49.

• Download Published Version (PDF / 127kB)

Turner, Jim; Pike, Graham and Brace, Nicola (2007). Interference effects from feature and PCA compositing procedures: Does composite construction interfere with eyewitness identification? In: Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition conference 2007 (SARMAC 2007), 25-29 Jul 2007., Lewiston-Auburn, Maine, USA..

Brace, Nicola; Pike, Graham and Turner, Jim (2007). Applying memory and cognition to facial compositing: Is eyewitness memory still the key problem? In: Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition conference 2007 (SARMAC 2007), 25-29 Jul 2007, Lewiston-Auburn, Maine, USA..

Brace, Nicola; Pike, Graham; Kemp, Richard; Turner, Jim and Bennett, Peter (2006). Does the presentation of multiple facial composites improve suspect identification? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2) pp. 213–266.

Brace, Nicola; Pike, Graham; Turner, Jim and Kynan, Sally (2005). Do PCA compositing systems make better use of witness cognition than traditional systems? In: Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition conference 2005 (SARMAC 2005), 5-8 Jan 2005, Wellington, New Zealand.

Pike, Graham; Brace, Nicola; Kynan, Sally and Turner, Jim (2005). Comparing two PCA compositing interfaces: Is it better to limit or encourage witness interaction? In: Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition conference 2005 (SARMAC 2005), 5-8 Jan 2005, Wellington, New Zealand.

Turner, Jim; Pike, Graham; Kynan, Sally and Brace, Nicola (2005). Do array-based composite construction systems interfere with witness recognition memory? In: Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition conference 2005 (SARMAC 2005), 5-8 Jan 2005, Wellington, New Zealand.

Pike, Graham; Brace, Nicola; Turner, Jim and Kynan, Sally (2005). Making faces with computers: Witness cognition and technology. Pragmatics & Cognition, 13(3) pp. 459–479.

• Download Accepted Manuscript (PDF / 234kB)

Turner, Jim; Pike, Graham; Brace, Nicola and Kemp, Richard (2001). The eyes have it: Feature saliency and facial composite construction. In: European Association of Psychology and Law conference 2001 (EAPL 2001), Jun 2001, Lisbon, Portugal.

Turner, Jim; Pike, Graham; Kemp, Richard and Brace, Nicola (2000). Applying perceptual research to E-FIT construction: A minimal face experiment. In: European Association of Psychology and Law conference 2000 (EAPL 2000), Apr 2000, Limassol, Cyprus.

Turner, Jim; Bennett, Peter; Pike, Graham; Brace, Nicola and Kemp, Richard (1999). Applying perceptual research to E-FIT construction. In: European Association of Psychology and Law conference 1999 (EAPL 1999), Jul 1999, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.