[Book Review] Andrew von Hirsch and A.P. Simester (eds.) Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing. 2006

Millie, Andrew (2007). [Book Review] Andrew von Hirsch and A.P. Simester (eds.) Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing. 2006. In British Society of Criminology Book Reviews British Society of Criminology, London, UK.

Abstract

There are many things that offend me, however I would not like to live in a society where my beliefs on acceptability are not challenged, where I am not offended. This is a standard liberal take on modern living and, one would hope, has some sway in most liberally-leaning democracies. As Paul Roberts states in Chapter one of this volume, “…one should seriously entertain the possibility that to be offended from time to time, even wrongfully offended, might be socially beneficial and healthy for personal growth and well-being” (p19). In putting this book together, Andrew von Hirsch and AP Simester have focused on an important area for research - one that extends beyond penal theory and ethics to wider philosophical, jurisprudential and criminological study. Quite simply, what actions or speech can be regarded as uncivil or offensive, to the extent that they necessitate criminalisation or regulation? The volume covers some fundamental questions for criminologists - that perhaps do not get asked as often as they might - regarding wrongfulness, intent, harm, injury, disgust and, of course, offence. The focus is on incivility and, drawing on recent policy and politics in the UK, anti-social behaviour; yet many of the book’s discussions have a broader impact.

Viewing alternatives

Item Actions

Export

You can export this page using these formats