Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Lillis, Theresa and Leedham, Maria
(2024).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2024.2314608
Abstract
This paper brings together two areas of importance to social work education, professional identity and professional writing; identity is often viewed as central to social work practice and education, whilst writing as marginal. However, given that social work is a ‘writing intensive’ profession (Lillis et al., 2017), writing is a key site of the enactment of professional identity and practice, meriting significant attention. Using the notion of ‘voice’ the paper explores professional identity in writing by analysing two datasets: 1) a corpus of 1 million words of professional social work writing, exploring the use of I and my perspectival phrases; 2) interviews with 71 social workers exploring perspectives on professional voice in written discourse. Textual analysis indicates six key functions of the social worker I, with an emphasis on the professional voice as reporter, rather than evaluator or analyst. Thematic interview analysis offers insights into the complexity of voice, indicating the contested positioning of the social worker I. We call for critical attention to be paid to voicing in written discourse in social work education and ongoing professional development, indicating ways in which findings and data from this article could be used as resources for pedagogy and debate.