Authoritarianism, democracy and de/Centralization in federations: what connections?

Dardanelli, Paolo; Kincaid, John; Adeney, Katharine; Moscovich, Lorena; Olmeda Cruz, Juan; Schlegel, Rogerio; Suberu, Rotimi; Boni, Filippo and Lacroix Eussler, Santiago (2023). Authoritarianism, democracy and de/Centralization in federations: what connections? Regional and Federal Studies (Early access).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2023.2274861

Abstract

What is the impact of democracy/authoritarianism regime change on de/centralization in federations? Based on the annual coding of three politico-institutional aspects, 22 policy fields, and five fiscal categories, this article maps de/centralization in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria and Pakistan from the establishment of their respective federal orders to 2020. It shows that de/centralization varies greatly across its different dimensions as well as between systems, with centralization being the dominant long-term trend but with significant exceptions, notably Pakistan. Regime change plays a major role in de/centralization but not always in line with the usual expectation that authoritarian regimes centralize and democratic ones decentralize. Other factors that cut across the authoritarianism/democracy divide, notably ideological orientations, have substantial impacts on de/centralization. By investigating long-run patterns of de/centralization in federations that have experienced democracy/authoritarianism regime change, the article sheds light on how federalism operates beyond consolidated democracies.

Viewing alternatives

Download history

Metrics

Public Attention

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Number of Citations

Citations from Dimensions

Item Actions

Export

About

Recommendations