Copy the page URI to the clipboard
McMillan, Elizabeth and Carlisle, Ysanne
(2003).
Abstract
Comparative considerations of strategy from complexity paradigm and Newtonian paradigm perspectives are discussed in the light of three ideological dispositions towards the future. We term them defensive, opportunist, and goal oriented. Over the years, the strategy literature has identified a number of strategic archetypes (e.g. Miller and Freisen, 1978). What is interesting from our point of view is the patterns of reasoning that underpin them. The study of ideology has identified qualitative patterns of reasoning which underpin different types of strategic decision in both the fields of politics and strategic management. This paper considers three patterns of reasoning and considers how they relate to the complexity and Newtonian paradigms.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 7497
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- Keywords
- complexity; strategic archetypes; strategic thought patterns
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) - Copyright Holders
- © 2003 The Authors
- Depositing User
- Elizabeth McMillan