Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Chimisso, Cristina
(2019).
Abstract
Unlike the object of other epistemologies, the object of historical epistemology is historical and regional, as it focuses on individual sciences, indeed particular domains within a science, in their historical development. But how does the historical epistemologist construct her historical and regional object? Which type of history can answer epistemological questions? I analyse the object of Georges Canguilhem’s epistemology in the context of historical epistemology, by comparing it in particular with Léon Brunschvicg’s and Gaston Bachelard’s. I argue that the ‘impure’ objects of the life sciences and medicine guided Canguilhem towards a view of the epistemologist’s object which similarly cannot be rectified in the way that Bachelard had proposed.