Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Hinchliffe, Steve
(2001).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00014
Abstract
Increasingly, non-human geographies have unfastened nature from its foundational moorings. In a parallel development, the benefits of adhering to precautionary and participatory forms of decision-making have become common place in environmental geography and in government policy. And yet, on closer inspection, there is a danger in these latter approaches that old certainties regarding non-human natures remain unquestioned. The result can be a tendency to gravitate towards bureaucratic and technical solutions to, or closures on, what are, first and foremost, political and open-ended problems. This paper uses an empirical engagement with BSE-related scientific and policy practices, along with insights from non-human geographies, science studies and poststructuralism to suggest that such certainties and resolutions are misplaced.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 6618
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 0020-2754
- Keywords
- uncertainty; BSE; environmental geography; decision-making; precautionary principle; actor network theory; Environmental Geography Decision-making Precautionary Principle Actor Network Theory
- Academic Unit or School
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
- Research Group
- OpenSpace Research Centre (OSRC)
- Depositing User
- Stephen Hinchliffe