Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Armitage, Vici; Kelly, Laura and Phoenix, Jo
(2016).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12181
Abstract
This article revisits claims about the relationship between ‘standardisation’, ‘discretion’ and ‘accountability’ in youth justice made in the wake of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. We argue that less centralisation and less standardisation have transformed accountability, but this is experienced differently according to the place held in the organisational hierarchy. This recognition demands a more nuanced understanding of ‘practitioner discretion’, which can account for differences between managerial and frontline experiences of what we describe as ‘janus‐faced youth justice work’, and a broad definition of the youth justice field and associated actors.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 59861
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 2059-1101
- Project Funding Details
-
Funded Project Name Project ID Funding Body Not Set ES/J009857/1 Economic and Social Research Council Not Set ES/J009857/2 Economic and Social Research Council - Keywords
- accountability; discretion; managerialism; youth justice
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Social Policy and Criminology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Copyright Holders
- © 2016 The Howard League and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
- Depositing User
- Joanna Phoenix