Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Mcfaul, Hugh
(2016).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rww024
Abstract
Discrimination – Sexual orientation – Less favourable treatment – Plaintiff homosexual ordering cake from defendant bakery to include slogan ‘Support Gay Marriage’ – Defendant company directors initially accepting but subsequently telephoning to refuse to fulfil order, offering a refund and explaining that bakery was Christian business and order should not have been taken – Whether refusal amounting to direct or indirect discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, if so whether relevant provisions could be read down to take account of defendant directors’ rights to manifest religious belief – Whether defendants having right not to be compelled to express or commit them to a viewpoint – Human Rights Act 1998, Sch 1, Pt 1, arts 8, 9, 10, 14, 17 – Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 – Fair Employment and Treatment Order 1998
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 56783
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 2047-0789
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Law
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) - Copyright Holders
- © 2016 Hugh McFaul
- Depositing User
- Hugh McFaul