Copy the page URI to the clipboard
McGilp, H.; Eckert, C. and Earl, C.
(2016).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.220
URL: http://www.drs2016.org/proceedings/
Abstract
Although there is little systematic research in academia or industry examining design processes in Fashion, anecdotal evidence, based on self- reports and observations, suggests that designers very rarely record the process of designing. Conversely, benefits and requirements of recording the design process within other domains, such as Engineering and Architecture, are well supported in the literature. This paper attempts to explore the dichotomy of recording and non-recording practice across these fields through a review of the literature, semi-structured interviews and a report on one case study in particular, drawing out further detail. Commonalities and differences are identified and new directions for research proposed.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 55159
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- ISSN
- 2398-3132
- Project Funding Details
-
Funded Project Name Project ID Funding Body Design Star Centre for Doctoral Training 1507030 AHRC - Keywords
- fashion design; recording; design process; comparative design
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - Research Group
- Design and Innovation
- Copyright Holders
- © 2016 The Authors
- Depositing User
- Helen Mcgilp