Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Haigh, Matthew
(2006).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2005.08.012
Abstract
Investment products that deploy ethical values and social considerations in portfolio construction have persisted since the 1980s. Pitting Habermasian discourse ethics against Foucauldian power relations and radical institutionalism, the paper argues that socially directed mutual funds ascribe capital markets with validities of high moral magnitude, work up extant tendencies toward financial hegemony and stymie criticism of the political–economic order. Institutional pressures do not permit the exercise of an ethic stronger than an aesthetic care of the self. The balance struck between economic and social priorities is investigated by interviewing investment managers, reviewing archival material and surveying the attitudes of unit holders in retail social mutual funds.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 50565
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1045-2354
- Keywords
- Foucault; Habermas; Capital markets; Ethics; Mutual funds; Non-governmental organizations; Shareholder activism
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business > Department for Accounting and Finance
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) - Copyright Holders
- © 2005 Elsevier Ltd.
- Depositing User
- Matthew Haigh