Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Bell, Emma and Taylor, Scott
(2013).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2012.761487
Abstract
This essay addresses the apparent exclusion of historical methods from management research methods textbooks. We suggest that this alleged ostracism is in fact only partial, if the notion of history is defined more broadly to include historicizing research methodologies such as discourse analysis. We also note the reluctance of the community of historians to be clear or reflexive about the methods in use as a potential explanation for the separation historians feel. We conclude by arguing that the community of historians would be better served by a greater degree of openness and reflexivity, in order to construct a more emancipated methodological present and achieve more presence in methods textbooks.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 48625
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1744-9367
- Keywords
- business history; historiography; methodology; textbooks; reflexivity
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business > Department for People and Organisations
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) - Copyright Holders
- © 2013 Taylor & Francis
- Depositing User
- Emma Bell