Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Brown, Vivienne
(2006).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/58.1.343
Abstract
In this paper I raise some questions about the internal coherence of Hohfeld’s scheme of legal relations and in so doing I show that additional conceptual 'rights' resources may be identified. The dialectical strategy of my argument is thus to accept Hohfeld’s emphasis on the importance of analytical clarity in specifying the different legal relations and their logical properties, but I attempt to show that Hohfeld’s scheme actually elides certain key notions and thereby compresses the conceptual range of rights and duties. In particular, I identify the notions of a 'directly-protected active right' and a 'non-correlative duty', notions which are not available to Hohfeld's scheme yet which are commonly used in everyday rights discourse. I thus provide philosophical/conceptual support for two key terms in everyday rights discourse which legal philosophers, following Hohfeld, have mistakenly taken to be incoherent.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from Dimensions- Published Version (PDF) This file is not available for public download
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 4745
- Item Type
- Book Section
- ISBN
- 0-19-928539-X, 978-0-19-928539-6
- ISSN
- 2044-8422
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Economics
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Copyright Holders
- © 2006 Oxford University Press
- Depositing User
- Users 13 not found.