It's not me, it's you: miscomprehension in surveys

Hardy, Ben and Ford, Lucy R. (2014). It's not me, it's you: miscomprehension in surveys. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2) pp. 138–162.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113520185

Abstract

The ubiquity of surveys in organizational research means that their quality is of paramount importance. Commonly this has been addressed through the use of sophisticated statistical approaches with scant attention paid to item comprehension. Linguistic theory suggests that while everyone may understand an item, they may comprehend it in different ways. We explore this in two studies in which we administered three published scales and asked respondents to indicate what they believed the items meant, and a third study that replicated the results with an additional scale. These demonstrate three forms of miscomprehension: instructional (where instructions are not followed), sentential (where the syntax of a sentence is enriched or depleted as it is interpreted), and lexical (where different meanings of words are deployed). These differences in comprehension are not appreciable using conventional statistical analyses yet can produce significantly different results and cause respondents to tap into different concepts. These results suggest that item interpretation is a significant source of error, which has been hitherto neglected in the organizational literature. We suggest remedies and directions for future research.

Viewing alternatives

Metrics

Public Attention

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Number of Citations

Citations from Dimensions

Item Actions

Export

About

  • Item ORO ID
  • 40448
  • Item Type
  • Journal Item
  • ISSN
  • 1552-7425
  • Keywords
  • survey research; quantitative research; construct validation procedures
  • Academic Unit or School
  • Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
  • Copyright Holders
  • © 2014 The Author(s)
  • Depositing User
  • Ben Hardy

Recommendations