Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Ison, R. L.; High, C.; Blackmore, C. P. and Cerf, M.
(2000).
URL: http://www.quae.com/fr/r583-cow-up-a-tree.html
Abstract
A range of theoretical perspectives on learning and change are reviewed and explored within a framework that owes much to the second order cybernetic claim that all knowing is doing. It is the aspiration of the authors to enable distinctions by the reader that illuminate their practice or their reading of the case study chapters that follow. Our ambition is based on the claim that experience arises within the distinctions we make. In other words, the capacity to make more distinctions about learning and change can broaden the repertoire of choices for purposeful action available to stakeholders in industrial-country agricultures. These distinctions may better enable participants engaged in research and development to responsibly research, study or identify learning processes, claim that learning has occurred, purposefully design learning systems and begin to judge the value of doing any or all of these.