Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Prinsloo, Paul and Slade, Sharon
(2013).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460344
URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2460312
Abstract
Higher education institutions have collected and analysed student data for years, with their focus largely on reporting and management needs. A range of institutional policies exist which broadly set out the purposes for which data will be used and how data will be protected. The growing advent of learning analytics has seen the uses to which student data is put expanding rapidly. Generally though the policies setting out institutional use of student data have not kept pace with this change.
Institutional policy frameworks should provide not only an enabling environment for the optimal and ethical harvesting and use of data, but also clarify: who benefits and under what conditions, establish conditions for consent and the de-identification of data, and address issues of vulnerability and harm. A directed content analysis of the policy frameworks of two large distance education institutions shows that current policy frameworks do not facilitate the provision of an enabling environment for learning analytics to fulfil its promise.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 36934
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- ISBN
- 1-4503-1785-5, 978-1-4503-1785-6
- Keywords
- learning analytics; ethics; distance learning; policy
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) - Copyright Holders
- © 2013 ACM
- Related URLs
- Depositing User
- Sharon Slade