Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Simons, Joan
(2013).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.01.20.3.28.c9494
URL: http://nurseresearcher.rcnpublishing.co.uk/archive...
Abstract
Aim: To explain Q methodology, an untraditional approach to nursing research, by exploring the various stages involved in it and using two studies.
Background: Q has some of the advantages of qualitative and quantitative, methodologies. A defining principle of Q is its assumption that subjective viewpoints are amenable to systematic analysis. Q aims to identify shared views across a population. The orientation of the uncovered perspectives differs significantly from qualitative research and there is no researcher bias.
Data Sources: Studies on living with chronic pain and the therapeutic relationship in mental health nursing.
Review Methods: A review of the advantages and disadvantages of Q.
Discussion: In areas where there are many contradictions and contrasting views, for example nursing practice, such a methodology could bring clarity in identifying subjective views of different groups. This article will first present the methodology followed by two examples of studies that have been carried out.
Conclusion: This article demonstrates that Q has much to offer nurse researchers, because the identification of patients' viewpoints in a reliable way has the potential to help nurses to deliver evidence-based practice in response to patients' needs.
Implications for Research/Practice: Q methodology has much to offer nursing research because the identification of patients' viewpoints has the potential to enhance nurses' abilities to deliver responsive evidence-based practice.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from Dimensions- Request a copy from the author This file is not available for public download