Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Smith, Pam; Mackintosh, Maureen; Ross, Fiona; Clayton, Julie; Price, Linnie; Christian, Sara; Byng, Richard and Allan, Helen
(2012).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011100
Abstract
Objectives
This paper examines how the interaction between financial and clinical risk at two critical phases of health care reform in England has been experienced by frontline staff caring for vulnerable patients with long term conditions.
Methods
The paper draws on contracting theory and two interdisciplinary and in-depth qualitative research studies undertaken in 1995 and 2007. Methods common to both studies included documentary analysis and interviews with managers and front line professionals. The 1995 study employed action-based research and included observation of community care; the 2007 study used realistic evaluation and included engagement with service user groups.
Results
In both reform processes, financial risk was increasingly devolved to frontline practitioners and smaller organisational units such as GP commissioning groups, with payment by unit of activity, aimed at changing professionals’ behaviour. This financing increased perceived clinical risk and fragmented the delivery of health and social care services requiring staff efforts to improve collaboration and integration, and created some perverse incentives and staff demoralisation.
Conclusions
Health services reform should only shift financial risk to frontline professionals to the extent that it can be efficiently borne. Where team work is required, contracts should reward collaborative multi-professional activity.
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
