Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Hancock, Lynn and Mooney, Gerry
(2012).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2012.683294
Abstract
The idea of a ‘broken society’ is advanced by Conservative politicians in the UK as emblematic of social and moral decay. With many echoes of long-standing claims of societal and moral breakdown, the narrative centres on ‘irresponsibility’ and ‘disorderly’ behaviours in disadvantaged working class communities and asserts that welfare dependency is the underlying condition which produces ‘social breakdown’. Social housing estates and the populations therein, in particular, are represented as problematic and vulnerable on a number of different levels, especially in the frequently interlinked notion of ‘welfare ghetto’. In this paper we adopt an interdisciplinary approach, utilising Loïc Wacquant’s recent work on ‘territorial stigmatisation’ and his thesis on the ‘ghetto’, to critique these narratives; and we explore the work these notions perform to legitimise increasingly pervasive state interventions to regulate and control working class lives and communities. The classed assumptions underpinning these discourses are revealed in this context.