Wicked comparisons: reflections on cross-national research about health inequalities in the UK

Blackman, Tim; Hunter, David; Marks, Linda; Harrington, Barbara; Elliott, Eva; Williams, Gareth; Greene, Alex and McKee, Lorna (2010). Wicked comparisons: reflections on cross-national research about health inequalities in the UK. Evaluation, 16(1) pp. 43–57.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389009350016

Abstract

This article discusses a comparative study of how local actors tackle health inequalities in England, Scotland and Wales. The main method used in this study was a thematic analysis of 200 interview transcripts. Its focus was on how health inequalities are framed for intervention by performance assessment systems and the challenge for these systems that their nature as a ‘wicked issue’ presents. The three different national contexts are described, including organizational structures and the use of targets, and the difficulty of making evaluative comparisons is considered. Reflecting on results from the study, it is concluded that both divergence and convergence in themes across the three countries reveal narrative patterns that draw on discourses rather than evidence. The nature of national performance audit regimes appears to play an important part in shaping these discourses, which are themselves evolving, partly in interaction with local feedback.

Viewing alternatives

Metrics

Item Actions

Export

You can export this page using these formats Digital Object Identifier - DOI

About

• Item ORO ID
• 30976
• Item Type
• Journal Item
• ISSN
• 1356-3890
• Project Funding Details

• Funded Project Name	Project ID	Funding Body
  Not Set	Not Set	ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council)

• Keywords
• health inequalities; United Kingdom; devolution; discourse analysis; comparative research; national comparisons; performance assessment
• Academic Unit or School
• Other Departments > Vice-Chancellor's Office
  Other Departments
• Copyright Holders
• © 2010 The Author(s)
• Depositing User
• Tim Blackman