Legitimising dialogue as textual and ideological goal in academic writing for assessment and publication

Lillis, Theresa (2011). Legitimising dialogue as textual and ideological goal in academic writing for assessment and publication. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10(4) pp. 403–434.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211398106

Abstract

The semiotic world that we inhabit (within and outside the academy) is fast changing in terms of the resources that are used and the practices in which many engage. Yet the institutional norms governing highly consequential academic texts – students’ texts assessed as part of their disciplinary-based activity and scholars’ papers submitted for publication – lack engagement with this array of resources and, epistemologically, continue to drive a monologic stance towards academic meaning making. The aim of this article is to argue for a reconfiguring of the textual goal of academic writing, through one simple yet transformative tool, that of juxtaposition. Textual juxtaposition is illustrated in this article, and its intellectual and ideological value discussed, drawing on Bakhtin’s emphasis on dialogue, using several examples from published academic texts. The relevance to scholarly and student writing is explored.

Viewing alternatives

Metrics

Item Actions

Export

You can export this page using these formats Digital Object Identifier - DOI

About

• Item ORO ID
• 30942
• Item Type
• Journal Item
• ISSN
• 1741-265X
• Keywords
• Bakhtin; dialogic; essayist literacy; monologic; textual juxtaposition; transforming academic writing
• Academic Unit or School
• Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
• Research Group
• Language & Literacies
• Copyright Holders
• © 2011 The Author(s)
• Depositing User
• Theresa Lillis