Evaluation of analytical instrumentation. Part XXIII. Instrumentation portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry

Greenfield, S.; Bernard, M.; Burgess, C.; Edwards, D.; Hill, S. J.; Jarvis, K. E.; Lord, G.; Sargent, M.; Potts, P. J.; Price, J.; West, M. and Newman, E. J. (2008). Evaluation of analytical instrumentation. Part XXIII. Instrumentation portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Accreditation and Quality Assurance: Journal for Quality, Comparability and Reliability in Chemical Measurement, 13(8) pp. 453–464.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0358-x

Abstract

The reports of this series tabulate a number of features of analytical instruments that should be considered when making comparison between various systems. Scoring these features in a rational manner allows a scientific comparison to be made between instruments as an aid to selection. This is the XXIII report of the series and deals with instrumentation for portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.

Viewing alternatives

Metrics

Item Actions

Export

You can export this page using these formats Digital Object Identifier - DOI

About

• Item ORO ID
• 28251
• Item Type
• Journal Item
• ISSN
• 1432-0517
• Extra Information
• The Analytical Methods Committee received and approved this report from the Instrumental Criteria Sub-Committee, whose membership is listed above.
• Keywords
• instrumentation; overview; evaluation; X-ray fluorescence spectrometry
• Academic Unit or School
• Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences
  Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
• Copyright Holders
• © 2008 Royal Society of Chemistry
• Depositing User
• Astrid Peterkin