Identification of morphological biosignatures in Martian analogue field specimens using in situ planetary instrumentation

Pullan, Derek; Westall, Frances; Hofmann, Beda A.; Parnell, John; Cockell, Charles S.; Edwards, Howell G. M.; Villar, Susana E. Jorge; Schröder, Christian; Cressey, Gordon; Marinangeli, Lucia; Richter, Lutz and Klingelhöfer, Göstar (2008). Identification of morphological biosignatures in Martian analogue field specimens using in situ planetary instrumentation. Astrobiology, 8(1) pp. 119–156.



We have investigated how morphological biosignatures (i.e., features related to life) might be identified with an array of viable instruments within the framework of robotic planetary surface operations at Mars. This is the first time such an integrated lab-based study has been conducted that incorporates space-qualified instrumentation designed for combined in situ imaging, analysis, and geotechnics (sampling).

Specimens were selected on the basis of feature morphology, scale, and analogy to Mars rocks. Two types of morphological criteria were considered: potential signatures of extinct life (fossilized microbial filaments) and of extant life (crypto-chasmoendolithic microorganisms). The materials originated from a variety of topical martian analogue localities on Earth, including impact craters, high-latitude deserts, and hydrothermal deposits.

Our in situ payload included a stereo camera, microscope, Mössbauer spectrometer, and sampling device (all space-qualified units from Beagle 2), and an array of commercial instruments, including a multi-spectral imager, an X-ray spectrometer (calibrated to the Beagle 2 instrument), a micro-Raman spectrometer, and a bespoke (custom-designed) X-ray diffractometer. All experiments were conducted within the engineering constraints of in situ operations to generate realistic data and address the practical challenges of measurement.

Our results demonstrate the importance of an integrated approach for this type of work. Each technique made a proportionate contribution to the overall effectiveness of our “pseudopayload” for biogenic assessment of samples yet highlighted a number of limitations of current space instrument technology for in situ astrobiology.

Viewing alternatives


Public Attention

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Number of Citations

Citations from Dimensions
No digital document available to download for this item

Item Actions