Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Yu, Keming and Jones, M. C.
(1997).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(97)00006-6
Abstract
Two popular nonparametric conditional quantile estimation methods, local constant fitting and local linear fitting, are compared. We note the relative lack of differences in results between the two approaches. While maintaining the expected preference for the local linear version, the arguments in favour are relatively slight, at least in the interior, and not as compelling as may be thought. The main differences between the approaches lie at the boundaries.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 24126
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 0167-9473
- Keywords
- boundary behaviour; conditional quantile; kernel smoothing; local polynomial fit
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Mathematics and Statistics
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - Copyright Holders
- © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
- Depositing User
- Sarah Frain