Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Jones, M. C. and Signorini, D. F.
(1997).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1997.10474062
URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2965571
Abstract
We consider many kernel-based density estimators, all theoretically improving bias from O(h2), as the smoothing parameter h → 0, to O(h4). Examples include higher-order kernels, variable kernel methods, and transformation and multiplicative bias-correction approaches. We stress the similarities between what appear to be disparate approaches. In particular, we show how the mean squared errors of all methods have the same form. Our main practical contribution is a comparative simulation study that isolates the most promising approaches. It remains debatable, however, as to whether even the best methods give worthwhile improvements, at least for small-to-moderate sample exploratory purposes.