Reorienting the Business School agenda: the case for relevance, rigor, and righteousness

Birnik, Andreas and Billsberry, Jon (2008). Reorienting the Business School agenda: the case for relevance, rigor, and righteousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4) pp. 985–999.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9607-x

Abstract

This article contributes to the current debate regarding management education and research. It frames the current business school critique as a paradox regarding the arguments for ‘self-interest’ versus ‘altruism’ as human motives. Based on this, a typology of management with four representative types labeled: unguided, altruistic, egoistic, and righteous is developed. It is proposed that the path to the future of management education and research might be found by relegitimizing the ‘altruistic’ spirit of the classics of the great Axial Age (900-200 BCE) and marrying those ideas with the self-interest ideal of mainstream management theories based on economics. By advocating this, a business school agenda that is simultaneously rigorous, relevant, and righteous is promoted.

Viewing alternatives

Look up in Google Scholar

Metrics

Public Attention

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Number of Citations

Citations from Dimensions
No digital document available to download for this item

Item Actions

Export

About

  • Item ORO ID
  • 16208
  • Item Type
  • Journal Item
  • ISSN
  • 1573-0697
  • Keywords
  • altruism; business school agenda; management education; relevance versus rigor; righteousness; self-interest
  • Academic Unit or School
  • Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
  • Depositing User
  • Colin Smith
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

Recommendations