Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Benn, Neil; Buckingham Shum, Simon; Domingue, John and Mancini, Clara
(2008).
URL: http://www.booksonline.iospress.com/Content/View.a...
Abstract
Mapping scholarly debates is an important genre of what can be called Knowledge Domain Analytics (KDA) technology – i.e. technology which combines both quantitative and qualitative methods of analysing specialist knowledge domains. However, current KDA technology research has emerged from diverse traditions and thus lacks a common conceptual foundation. This paper reports on the design of a KDA ontology that aims to provide this foundation. The paper then describes the argumentation extensions to the ontology for supporting scholarly debate mapping as a special form of KDA and demonstrates its expressive capabilities using a case study debate.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 11939
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- Extra Information
- ISBN 978-1-58603-859-5
- Keywords
- Scholarly Debate Mapping; Macro-argument Analysis; Ontologies
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Knowledge Media Institute (KMi)
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications - Research Group
- Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
- Depositing User
- Users 8493 not found.