Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Guppy, Andrew; Edwards, Julian A.; Brough, Paula; Peters-Bean, Kyron M.; Sale, Craig and Short, Emma
(2004).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915900
Abstract
Throughout the literature, there appears to be little support for the psychometric characteristics of scales measuring coping behaviour. This article explores the psychometric properties of the 20-item version of the Cybernetic Coping Scale (CCS; Edwards & Baglioni, 1993). Initially, confirmatory factor analysis and internal reliability analysis were conducted on large samples of data from four different studies in order to conduct an exhaustive examination of the scale. Results provided moderate support for the 20-item version of the CCS. However, improved model modification produced moderate to strong support for a 15-item version. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was then conducted on the 15-item version of the CCS in order to cross-validate the measurement model across groups. Findings revealed a well-fitting model with a stable factor structure and partial measurement invariance. Both versions produced acceptable to high internal reliability. Findings indicate support for the use of the 15-item version of the CCS and suggest that this short version of the CCS is the best fitting model of all the other previously developed CCS scales.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 86003
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- Keywords
- psychometric properties; Cybernetic Coping Scale; multigroup confirmatory factor analysis across four samples
- Academic Unit or School
-
Other Departments > Human Resources
Other Departments - Research Group
-
Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC)
Open Psychology Research Centre - Copyright Holders
- © 2004 The British Psychological Society
- Depositing User
- Julian Edwards