Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Derry, Caroline
(2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12396
Abstract
This article explores the Scottish defamation case Woods and Pirie v Cumming Gordon (1811-1812) in order to demonstrate the value of legal readings across the broadest spectrum of socio-legal history. While the case has attracted attention from social historians, particularly historians of sexuality, it was shrouded in secrecy and thus did not contribute to the development of legal doctrine. Nonetheless, careful attention to the specifically legal nature of the archive and proceedings deepens our understanding of them and their social implications. Woods and Pirie concerned an allegation of lesbianism made by a half-Indian, half-Scottish schoolgirl against her teachers. Its extensive records offer particularly rich material relating to gender, sexuality, race, nationality, and empire whose significance and limitations are only fully grasped if it is analysed with an understanding of its legal context. Ultimately, such engagements deepen our understanding of the law’s operation as well.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 84497
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 0263-323X
- Keywords
- History, legal history; socio-legal history; history of sexuality; lesbianism; Scots law
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Law
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) - Research Group
- Centre for the History of Crime, Policing and Justice
- Copyright Holders
- © 2022 The Authors
- Depositing User
- Caroline Derry