Kukulska-Hulme, Agnes; Traxler, John and Pettit, John
(2007).
![[img]](http://oro.open.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF (Not Set)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (492kB) |
| URL: | http://www.jld.qut.edu.au/ |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
The paper addresses the question of how to design for learning taking place on mobile and wireless devices. The authors argue that learning activity designers need to consider the characteristics of mobile learning; at the same time, it is vital to realise that learners are already creating mobile learning experiences for themselves. Profound changes in computer usage brought about by social networking and user-generated content are challenging the idea that educators are in charge of designing learning. The authors make a distinction between designed activity, carefully crafted in advance, and user-generated activity arising from learners’ own spontaneous requirements. The paper illustrates what each approach has to offer and it draws out what they have in common, the opportunities and constraints they represent. The paper concludes that user-generated mobile activity will not replace designed activity but it will influence the ways in which designed activity develops.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1832-8342 |
| Keywords: | mobile learning; learning design; user-generated content; citizen journalism; situated learning; contextual learning |
| Academic Unit/School: | Learning Teaching and Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET) Learning Teaching and Innovation (LTI) |
| Interdisciplinary Research Centre: | Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET) |
| Item ID: | 8080 |
| Depositing User: | Agnes Kukulska-Hulme |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Jun 2007 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Feb 2017 12:43 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/8080 |
| Share this page: |     |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.