Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Stenner, Paul
(2021).
Abstract
This paper offers an historically informed critique of Windelband’s famous distinction between idiography and nomothesis. The argument is organised into three sections. First, an historical examination of Windelband’s distinction situates his work as an intervention designed in part to displace Dilthey’s argument for Psychology being fundamental to the Geisteswissenschaften. A second section examines the new meaning ‘idiography’ acquired within North American ‘personology’ and research on personality. A final section urges a re-evaluation of this distinction based on a re-discovery of the continued relevance of Dilthey’s hermeneutic approach to Psychology.
Viewing alternatives
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 76192
- Item Type
- Book Section
- ISBN
- 88-6538-039-X, 978-88-6538-039-0
- Keywords
- Idiographic, nomothetic, hermeneutics, Psychology, History of Psychology, Wilhelm Dilthey, Wilhelm Windelband
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Research Group
- Open Psychology Research Centre
- Copyright Holders
- © 2021 Authors
- Depositing User
- Paul Stenner