Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Holliman, Richard and Allgaier, Joachim
(2006).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170600909738
Abstract
The question of whether religious explanations about the origin of life should be taught alongside scientific accounts in compulsory science education has sparked controversy in several countries for decades. An important site for these controversies is media reporting. This paper presents the results of a quantitative and qualitative analysis of UK national and regional newspaper coverage from 2002. The sampled articles reported the controversy about teaching creationism in science classes alongside the theory of evolution at Emmanuel College, Gateshead, UK. The results describe how the National Curriculum for Science was represented in these articles, in particular how scientific controversies were initially described and revised as the public debate developed. Furthermore, the article documents the mobilisation of a range of actors who used media reporting as an important channel to argue their case about this issue. It is argued that media reporting of creationism/evolution was an important factor in framing public debate about these issues, influencing, in part, the debate over which controversial science-based topics should be taught as part of the National Curriculum for Science.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 7599
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 0958-5176
- Keywords
- controversy; creationism/evolution; newspaper coverage; national curriculum for science; content analysis
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Institute of Educational Technology (IET) - Depositing User
- Richard Holliman