The Open UniversitySkip to content

Learning from interactions with software: a Popperian analysis

Aczel, James (2006). Learning from interactions with software: a Popperian analysis. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2/3) pp. 159–184.

Full text available as:
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (716kB)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


This paper introduces a method of analysing learning situations, based on the work of Karl Popper, and applies it to some examples of software-based teaching innovations. The basis of Popperian analysis is identification of processes of discontinuous trial-and-improvement of 'strategic theories' (students' conjectured constructions of some sort of reality) under the selection pressures provided by 'concerns' (problems of special interest to the student). It requires us to examine the mechanisms by which teachers' target problems become students' concerns; the mechanisms by which students improve upon their existing strategic theories in the direction of target theories; and the encouragement given to the raising of new problems. The examples considered include a CD-ROM on natural selection, a CD-ROM on the work of Homer, a tool for supporting the learning of formal reasoning, a negotiation simulation, and SimCity.

Item Type: Journal Item
ISSN: 1741-8119
Keywords: cognition; software; Popperian analysis; epistemology; psychology; problem-solving; evaluation; strategic theories; concerns; learning mechanisms
Academic Unit/School: Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 7149
Depositing User: James Aczel
Date Deposited: 21 Mar 2007
Last Modified: 02 May 2018 12:43
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU