Morlok, A.; Bowey, J.E.; Kohler, M. and Grady, M.M.
PDF (Not Set)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Infrared spectra of mineral grains from primitive meteorites could be useful for comparison with astronomical infrared spectra since some of their grains might be similar to those formed in the planet-forming disks around young stars or in the envelopes surrounding late-type stars. To assess the usefulness of meteorite spectra, olivine grains separated from primitive meteorites have been analyzed using FTIR microscope techniques in the 2-16 mu m wavelength range. The sub-micron sizes of the grains made a complex preparation process necessary.
Five characteristic bands were measured near 11.9, 11.2, 10.4, 10.1, and 10.0 mu m. The results of 59 analyses allow the calculation of band positions for meteoritic olivines as a function of their iron and magnesium contents. Comparison of the meteoritic results with astronomical data for comets and dust around young and old stars, which exhibit bands similar to the strongest infrared bands observed in the grains (at 11.2 mu m), show that the spectral resolution of the astronomical observations is too low to ascertain the exact iron and magnesium (Mg:Fe) ratio of the dust in the 8-13 mu m wavelength range.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||infrared-absorption spectra; carbonaceous chondrites; reflectance spectra; compositional dependence; crystalline silicates; interstellar grains; evolved stars; dust; mineralogy; fayalite|
|Academic Unit/School:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Physical Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR)|
|Depositing User:||Astrid Peterkin|
|Date Deposited:||27 Feb 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Nov 2016 20:40|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.