The Open UniversitySkip to content

Summative assessment in Higher Education: practices in disarray

Knight, Peter T. (2002). Summative assessment in Higher Education: practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3) pp. 275–286.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


The article begins with a view of learning and of what its assessment entails, arguing that it is helpful to distinguish between assessment systems primarily intended to provide feedout and those intended to provide feedback. Attention is then concentrated on summative, feedout, or high stakes assessment, which is supposed to be highly reliable. A number of difficulties with current practices are then identified, leading to the claim that high stakes assessment in first degrees is in such disarray that it is difficult to know what grades or classifications mean and risky to treat them as reliable. Two main lines of response are explored. The first treats this as a failure of technique, while the second adds that assessment purposes themselves have fallen into disarray, which requires a reappraisal of curriculum in addition to any technical changes that appear to be expedient.

Item Type: Journal Item
ISSN: 0307-5079
Academic Unit/School: Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 694
Depositing User: Users 12 not found.
Date Deposited: 16 May 2006
Last Modified: 02 May 2018 12:29
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU