The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

What ought a fruitful explicatum to be?

Pinder, Mark (2020). What ought a fruitful explicatum to be? Erkenntnis (In Press).

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00223-6
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Many concepts are inadequate for serious inquiry, so theorists often seek to engineer new concepts. The method of explication, which involves replacing concepts with more fruitful alternatives, is a model of this process. In this paper, I develop an account of fruitfulness, the Relevant-Goals Account of Fruitfulness. The account is in the spirit of extant proposals, but develops and extends them in important ways. In particular, while it applies to explications in general, the account allows us to derive substantive details for specific explications. This is achieved through a supplementary view, Contextualism, that specifies which theoretical goals are relevant in any given case. I close by discussing how the Relevant-Goals Account fits into the dynamic nature of inquiry.

Item Type: Journal Item
ISSN: 1572-8420
Keywords: explication; conceptual engineering; fruitfulness; carnap; concepts
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Philosophy
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Item ID: 69003
Depositing User: Mark Pinder
Date Deposited: 15 Jan 2020 09:45
Last Modified: 26 Mar 2020 03:14
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/69003
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU