The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Why we need to think about research malpractice in the social sciences

Murphy, Tony (2013). Why we need to think about research malpractice in the social sciences. Criminal Justice Matters, 94(1) pp. 26–27.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2013.865503
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Writing for the Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors in 1952, Professor Grant Redford highlighted the ‘pressures to publish’ within academia. Redford and others at the time noted how productive research formed a basis of promotion, and that such work was largely governed by ‘the questionable virtues of chance, accident, caprice and the least worthy elements of aggressive salesmanship’. In short, such an emphasis on publication was problematic at that time, just as it is now, but those words surely have never been as relevant as they are today. Increasingly, academics are forced to prove their worth through publication in peer reviewed journals, and demonstrate the ‘impact’ of their work. The dangers associated with such pressures have been widely explored and flagged-up within the disciplines of the natural or ‘hard’ sciences. This also includes the discipline of psychology.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2013 Centre for Crime and Justice Studies
ISSN: 0962-7251
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Social Policy and Criminology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Item ID: 68501
Depositing User: Anthony Murphy
Date Deposited: 16 Dec 2019 14:44
Last Modified: 16 Dec 2019 14:59
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/68501
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU