The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Exploring the core ‘preoccupation’ of social work writing: A corpus-assisted discourse study

Leedham, Maria; Lillis, Theresa and Twiner, Alison (2020). Exploring the core ‘preoccupation’ of social work writing: A corpus-assisted discourse study. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 3 pp. 1–26.

Full text available as:
[img] PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (297kB)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.18573/jcads.v3i1
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The profession of social work has become increasingly ‘writing intensive’ in recent decades, yet little empirical research has been carried out on the nature of this writing. This paper describes and explores the 1 million word corpus compiled as part of the ESRC-funded study ‘Writing in professional social work practice in a changing communicative landscape’ (WiSP http://www.writinginsocialwork.com), outlining the challenges involved in collecting and anonymising hard-to-reach texts from social workers (n=38) across three UK Local Authorities. Using the methodology of corpus-assisted discourse analysis alongside ethnographic insights and in consultation with expert insiders, the paper focuses on what a keyword analysis reveals about the core focus or ‘preoccupation’ (Baker, 2010) of social work writing. Attention is paid to the three main text categories of writing in social work – casenotes, emails and assessment reports – and to the three social work domains of children’s, adult generic and adult mental health services. Findings include confirmation of the extensive recording of communication exchanges, differences in the ways social workers refer to their own and service users’ views, and the considerable extent to which evaluation is threaded through all social work writing via the use of lexis. We also discuss how keyword analysis can provide a set of ‘candidate professional lexis’ and further examine selected items. The paper concludes by reflecting on aspects of methodology, in particular considering the subjectivity around keyword calculation, the equal treatment of all items in a corpus, and the usefulness of combining keyness analysis with additional data sources.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2020 Authors
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Writing in professional social work practice in a changing communicative landscapeES/M008703/1ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council)
Keywords: Social work; professional writing; casenotes; emails; reports; hard-to-access texts
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Languages and Applied Linguistics > English Language & Applied Linguistics
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Languages and Applied Linguistics
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Research Group: Language & Literacies
Related URLs:
Item ID: 67515
Depositing User: Maria Leedham
Date Deposited: 25 Oct 2019 12:36
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2020 05:25
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/67515
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU