The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Revising computerized therapy for wider appeal among adolescents: youth perspectives on a revised version of SPARX CCBT

Fleming, Theresa M.; Stasiak, Karolina; Emma, Moselen; Eve, Hermansson-Webb; Shepherd, Matthew; Lucassen, Mathijs; Bavin, Lynda M. and Merry, Sally (2019). Revising computerized therapy for wider appeal among adolescents: youth perspectives on a revised version of SPARX CCBT. Frontiers in Psychiatry

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (853kB) | Preview
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: The way in which computerized therapy is presented may be important for its uptake. We aimed to explore adolescents’ views on the appeal of a tested computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT) for depression (SPARX), and a revised version (SPARX-R). The versions were similar but while SPARX is presented explicitly as a treatment for depression, SPARX-R is presented as providing skills that could be useful for young people for when they were depressed, down, angry or stressed.

Methods: We held nine focus groups with a total of 79 adolescents (13–19 years old; 47 females; 34 New Zealand European; 22 Māori or Pacific; 60 reported having experienced feeling down or low for at least several days in a row). Groups viewed the opening sequences of SPARX and SPARX-R (in random order), then took part in a semi-structured discussion and completed a brief questionnaire. Responses were analyzed using a general inductive approach.

Results: Participants considered both SPARX and SPARX-R useful and considered the stated purpose of the program to be important. Four themes contrasted the two approaches: the first, ‘naming depression is risky’, referred to perceptions that an explicit focus on depression could be off-putting, including for adolescents with depression. The second theme of ‘universality’ reflected preferences for a universal approach as young people might not recognize that they were depressed, and that all would benefit from the program. In contrast, ‘validation’ reflected the view of a significant minority that naming depression could be validating for some. Finally, the theme of ‘choice’ reflected a near-unanimously expressed preference for both options to be offered, allowing user choice. In questionnaire responses, 40 (68%) of participants preferred SPARX-R, 13 (18%) preferred SPARX, whilst 10 (14%) ‘didn’t mind’. Responses were similar among participants who reported that they had experienced at least a few days of low mood and those who had not.

Conclusions: The way a CCBT program is presented may have implications for its appeal. The potential population impact of CCBT programs explicitly targeting depression and those targeting more universal feelings such as being stressed or depressed should be explored for varied user groups.

Item Type: Journal Item
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care > Health and Social Care
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Research Group: Health and Wellbeing PRA (Priority Research Area)
Item ID: 67214
Depositing User: Mathijs Lucassen
Date Deposited: 09 Oct 2019 13:57
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2019 01:26
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/67214
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU