Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Russell, Fiona Jane
(1992).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.00010179
Abstract
This thesis explores possible constraints on effective participation and the scope of alternatives considered by central policy makers, in a debate on the content of regulations to control pesticides. These aspects of the policy process were examined in a case study of the Food and Environment Protection Act (1985) and the Control of Pesticides Regulations (1986). Four issues affecting manufacture, marketing and use were examined in each of three chronological phases: pre-parliamentary, parliamentary and administrative. Interview data, interest group responses to two Government consultative documents and Hansard material were analysed. Key constraining factors framing the current debate were seen to encompass "situational" factors, which were historical (existing structures, past debates and views of long-standing central participants in the control system) or current (present procedures, time available and views of newer central participants), substantive or procedural. The operation and effects of such framing in the contemporary debate on the chosen issues are discussed.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 65913
- Item Type
- PhD Thesis
- Project Funding Details
-
Funded Project Name Project ID Funding Body Not Set Not Set Science and Engineering Research Council - Academic Unit or School
- Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
- Copyright Holders
- © 1992 Fiona Jane Russell
- Depositing User
- ORO Import