The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Professional Regulation In Social Media (PRISM): validation of a tool for making decisions about professional behaviours on social media

Ryan, Gemma Sinead (2019). Professional Regulation In Social Media (PRISM): validation of a tool for making decisions about professional behaviours on social media. In: RCN International Nursing Research Conference 2019, 3-5 Sep 2019.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (598kB) | Preview
URL: https://research.hscni.net/sites/default/files/pro...
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: There is ongoing debate around the concept of e-professionalism in the healthcare professions, with many incidents of unprofessional behaviour still reported despite policy and professional guidance having been in place for several years. A realist ethnographic study over 4 years identified inconsistent opinion across the nursing profession about what is or is not 'professional' in social media. As a result, a decision making tool was developed: Awareness to Action (A2A) 3Cs.

Aim: This project aimed to evaluate and validate the A2A 3Cs decision making tool for assessing whether behaviours in social media are acceptable, unacceptable, professional or unprofessional.

Method: A pre-test, post-test survey design was employed to assess the internal validity and reliability of the tool during January to November 2018. Participants were presented with five examples of behaviour in social media and used the tool to assess what action they would take (if any). A survey was also used to evaluate the usability, usefulness and relevance to nursing practice. Ethical approval was granted from two higher education institutions. Participants were recruited through social media, two higher education institutions and an NHS trust.

Results: 45 nurses completed the pre-test, post-test validation component and 122 evaluated the tool. Using SPSS v24.0, Intraclass correlation showed excellent reliability 0.979 [CI 0.940, 0.997] p=0.000. Cronhbach's Kappa for each of the case examples showed high levels of internal validity. Kruskill-Wallis testing demonstrated no significant difference in decisions made based on age, nursing role, length of time registered and region of the United Kingdom.

Conclusion: The A2A 3Cs tool could potentially be used to refine and develop a more aligned approach to policy and professional guidance, promote consistency in perspectives about what is deemed to be unprofessional in the nursing profession and in the education of nurses and healthcare professionals on the topic of e-professionalism.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Validation & evaluation of a decision-making tool for assessing behaviours and incidents involving nurses on social media503789Burdett Trust Burdett Trust for Nursing
Keywords: social media; online social networks; e-professionalism; validation
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care > Nursing
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Item ID: 62685
Depositing User: Gemma S Ryan
Date Deposited: 01 Aug 2019 14:57
Last Modified: 10 Sep 2019 01:10
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/62685
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU