The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

The strong gravitational lens finding challenge

Metcalf, R. B.; Meneghetti, M.; Avestruz, C.; Bellagamba, F.; Bom, C. R.; Bertin, E.; Cabanac, R.; Courbin, F.; Davies, A.; Decencière, E.; Flamary, R.; Gavazzi, R.; Geiger, M.; Hartley, P.; Huertas-Company, M.; Jackson, N.; Jacobs, C.; Jullo, E.; Kneib, J.-P.; Koopmans, L. V. E.; Lanusse, F.; Li, C.-L.; Ma, Q.; Makler, M.; Li, N.; Lightman, M.; Petrillo, C. E.; Serjeant, S.; Schäfer, C.; Sonnenfeld, A.; Tagore, A.; Tortora, C.; Tuccillo, D.; Valentín, M. B.; Velasco-Forero, S.; Verdoes Kleijn, G. A. and Vernardos, G. (2019). The strong gravitational lens finding challenge. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 625, article no. A119.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (3MB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832797
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Large-scale imaging surveys will increase the number of galaxy-scale strong lensing candidates by maybe three orders of magnitudes beyond the number known today. Finding these rare objects will require picking them out of at least tens of millions of images, and deriving scientific results from them will require quantifying the efficiency and bias of any search method. To achieve these objectives automated methods must be developed. Because gravitational lenses are rare objects, reducing false positives will be particularly important. We present a description and results of an open gravitational lens finding challenge. Participants were asked to classify 100 000 candidate objects as to whether they were gravitational lenses or not with the goal of developing better automated methods for finding lenses in large data sets. A variety of methods were used including visual inspection, arc and ring finders, support vector machines (SVM) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). We find that many of the methods will be easily fast enough to analyse the anticipated data flow. In test data, several methods are able to identify upwards of half the lenses after applying some thresholds on the lens characteristics such as lensed image brightness, size or contrast with the lens galaxy without making a single false-positive identification. This is significantly better than direct inspection by humans was able to do. Having multi-band, ground based data is found to be better for this purpose than single-band space based data with lower noise and higher resolution, suggesting that multi-colour data is crucial. Multi-band space based data will be superior to ground based data. The most difficult challenge for a lens finder is differentiating between rare, irregular and ring-like face-on galaxies and true gravitational lenses. The degree to which the efficiency and biases of lens finders can be quantified largely depends on the realism of the simulated data on which the finders are trained.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2019 ESO
ISSN: 0004-6361
Keywords: strong gravitational lensing; data analysis methods
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Physical Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Item ID: 61664
Depositing User: ORO Import
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2019 15:08
Last Modified: 13 Jun 2019 18:34
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/61664
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU