The Open UniversitySkip to content

Student perceptions of the language of disability, deficit and empowerment

Lister, Katharine and Coughlan, Tim (2018). Student perceptions of the language of disability, deficit and empowerment. In: Proceedings of the fifth Widening Participation Conference, Open University, Milton Keynes.

Full text available as:
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (198kB) | Preview
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


In a participatory research exercise with students, discomfort was expressed with the language and terminology used by higher education institutions (HEIs) to discuss disability. It was argued that this can be a factor in disclosure of disabilities, or in requests for adjustments or support. In response, a mixed-methods research project explored the language that students feel comfortable with, to identify gaps between this language and the social model language used in The Open University’s broadcast communications, and to investigate whether student-driven language norms could be adopted by the institution. While the findings identify that students are generally more comfortable with certain terms than others, they also show that views of appropriate language vary according to the context of the communication, and to demographics. The findings bring into question model-centric views of disability and language. Instead, we argue that they suggest a need for heterogeneous and context-driven language approaches.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Keywords: accessibility, disability, language, social model, medical model
Academic Unit/School: Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 58832
Depositing User: Tim Coughlan
Date Deposited: 25 Jan 2019 14:03
Last Modified: 15 Dec 2019 13:11
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU