Clark, Samuel J and Pawlyn, Jillian
(2019).
|
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview |
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: | https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp.2019.e1941 |
---|---|
Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
Healthcare professionals who support people who require an inhaler or nebuliser need to know how to use the devices, monitor and assess patients’ inhaler techniques effectively. Often, people have inadequate inhaler techniques, which can lead to poor management of their respiratory condition, increased signs and symptoms, reduced quality of life and increased use of primary/secondary care services and treatment costs. This article explains how to use inhalers and nebulisers appropriately and considers some of the challenges for children and adults with a learning disability. It also describes some devices and assessment tools, and explores assessment/review methods to help ensure people use their inhalers/nebulisers successfully.
Item Type: | Journal Item |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1465-8712 |
Extra Information: | Since acceptance there have been some changes to the location of the videos in the time out activities, these are now accessed via links within this page https://www.asthma.org.uk/advice/inhaler-videos/ |
Keywords: | asthma; autism; Down’s syndrome; learning disability; lung disease; respiratory; self-care |
Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care > Nursing Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) |
Item ID: | 58384 |
Depositing User: | Jillian Pawlyn |
Date Deposited: | 21 Dec 2018 11:22 |
Last Modified: | 02 May 2019 10:35 |
URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/58384 |
Share this page: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Metrics
Altmetrics from Altmetric | Citations from Dimensions |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.