The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Factors affecting consistency and accuracy in identifying modern macroperforate planktonic foraminifera

Fenton, Isabel S.; Baranowski, Ulrike; Boscolo-Galazzo, Flavia; Cheales, Hannah; Fox, Lyndsey; King, David J.; Larkin, Christina; Latas, Marcin; Liebrand, Diederik; Miller, C. Giles; Nilsson-Kerr, Katrina; Piga, Emanuela; Pugh, Hazel; Remmelzwaal, Serginio; Roseby, Zoe A.; Smith, Yvonne M.; Stukins, Stephen; Taylor, Ben; Woodhouse, Adam; Worne, Savannah; Pearson, Paul N.; Poole, Christopher R.; Wade, Bridget S. and Purvis, Andy (2018). Factors affecting consistency and accuracy in identifying modern macroperforate planktonic foraminifera. Journal of Micropalaeontology, 37(2) pp. 431–443.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (4MB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-431-2018
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Planktonic foraminifera are widely used in biostratigraphic, palaeoceanographic and evolutionary studies, but the strength of many study conclusions could be weakened if taxonomic identifications are not reproducible by different workers. In this study, to assess the relative importance of a range of possible reasons for among-worker disagreement in identification, 100 specimens of 26 species of macroperforate planktonic foraminifera were selected from a core-top site in the subtropical Pacific Ocean. Twenty-three scientists at different career stages – including some with only a few days experience of planktonic foraminifera – were asked to identify each specimen to species level, and to indicate their confidence in each identification. The participants were provided with a species list and had access to additional reference materials. We use generalised linear mixed-effects models to test the relevance of three sets of factors in identification accuracy: participant-level characteristics (including experience), species-level characteristics (including a participant’s knowledge of the species) and specimen-level characteristics (size, confidence in identification). The 19 less experienced scientists achieve a median accuracy of 57 %, which rises to 75 % for specimens they are confident in. For the 4 most experienced participants, overall accuracy is 79 %, rising to 93 % when they are confident. To obtain maximum comparability and ease of analysis, everyone used a standard microscope with only 35× magnification, and each specimen was studied in isolation. Consequently, these data provide a lower limit for an estimate of consistency. Importantly, participants could largely predict whether their identifications were correct or incorrect: their own assessments of specimen-level confidence and of their previous knowledge of species concepts were the strongest predictors of accuracy.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2018 The Authors
ISSN: 2041-4978
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Item ID: 57330
Depositing User: Katrina Kerr
Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2018 10:53
Last Modified: 03 May 2019 11:34
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/57330
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU