Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Lotz, Nicole; Jones, Derek and Holden, Georgy
(2018).
URL: http://www.drs2018limerick.org/participation/proce...
Abstract
This study looks at the qualities of learner-generated online content, as rated by experts, and how these relate to learners’ engagement through comments and conversations around this content. The work uploaded to an Online Design Studio by students across a Design and Innovation Qualification was rated and analysed quantitatively using the Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT). Correlations of qualities to comments made on this content were considered and a qualitative analysis of the comments was carried out. It was observed that design students do not necessarily pay attention to the same qualities in learner-generated content that experts rate highly, except for a particular quality at the first level of study. The content that students do engage with also changes with increasing levels of study. These findings have implications for the learning design of online design courses and qualifications as well as for design institutions seeking to supplement proximate design studios with Online Social Network Services.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 56874
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- ISSN
- 2398-3132
- Project Funding Details
-
Funded Project Name Project ID Funding Body Are we making process? Not Set The Open University (OU) - Keywords
- online design studio; online social network; learner-generated content; consensual assessment technique
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - Research Group
- Design and Innovation
- Copyright Holders
- © 2018 The Authors
- Depositing User
- Nicole Lotz