The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Debris-flow release processes investigated through the analysis of multi-temporal LiDAR datasets in north-western Iceland

Morino, Costanza; Conway, Susan J.; Balme, Matthew R.; Hillier, John; Jordan, Colm; Saemundsson, Þorsteinn and Argles, Tom (2019). Debris-flow release processes investigated through the analysis of multi-temporal LiDAR datasets in north-western Iceland. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44(1) pp. 144–159.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (4MB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4488
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Debris flows are fast‐moving gravity flows of poorly sorted rock and soil, mixed and saturated with water. Debris‐flow initiation has been studied using empirical and experimental modelling, but the geomorphic changes, indicative of different triggering processes, are difficult to constrain with field observations only. We identify signatures to distinguish two different debris‐flow release styles by integrating high‐resolution multi‐temporal remote sensing datasets and morphometric analysis. We analyse debris flows sourced above the town of Ísafjörður (Iceland). Two debris‐flow triggering processes were previously hypothesized for this site: (i) slope failure, characterised by landslides evolving into debris flows, and (ii) the fire‐hose effect, in which debris accumulated in pre‐existing, steep‐sided bedrock passages is transported by a surge of water. It is unknown which process dominates and determines the local risk. To investigate this question, we compare airborne LiDAR elevation models and aerial photographs collected in 2007 with similar data from 2013. We find that two new debris‐flow tracks were created by slope failures. These are characterised by steep sliding surfaces and lateral leveed channels. Slope failure also occurred in two large, recently active tracks, creating the preparatory conditions for the fire‐hose effect to mobilise existing debris. These tracks show alternating zones of fill and scour along their length, and debris stored below the source‐area at rest angles >35°. Our approach allows us to identify and quantify the morphological changes produced by slope failure release process, which generated the preparatory conditions for the fire‐hose effect. As debris flows are rarely observed in action and morphological changes induced by them are difficult to detect and monitor, the same approach could be applied to other landscapes to understand debris‐flow initiation in absence of other monitoring information, and can improve the identification of zones at risk in inhabited areas near hillslopes with potential for debris flows.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2018 The Authors
ISSN: 1096-9837
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
CENTA Doctoral Training PartnershipNot SetNERC (Natural Environment Research Council)
CENTA Doctoral Training PartnershipNot SetBritish Geological Survey University Funding Initiative
Keywords: debris flow; release styles; LiDAR; multi-temporal analysis; NW Iceland
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Physical Sciences
Item ID: 56410
Depositing User: Thomas Argles
Date Deposited: 31 Aug 2018 11:59
Last Modified: 15 Oct 2019 17:22
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/56410
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU