The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Algorithmic criticism, Distant Reading and the Edinburgh Review

Benatti, Francesca and King, David (2017). Algorithmic criticism, Distant Reading and the Edinburgh Review. In: BARS (British Association for Romantic Studies) 2017 Romantic Improvement, 27-30 Jul 2017, University of York, UK.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Death of the Human Author, Birth of the Machine Reader?

The centrality of authorship in literary studies has been under attack for the last few decades. Yet Digital Humanities methods such as computational authorship attribution or “stylometry” seem to herald a rebirth of the author as a key interpretative category and can give rise to fears of a corresponding death of the reader, substituted by the machine.

This paper will present a critical interrogation of the use of Digital Humanities methods to study Romantic periodical authorship. It presents a case study based upon the project A Question of Style: individual voices and corporate identity in the Edinburgh Review, 1814-20, funded by a Research Society for Victorian Periodicals Field Development grant.

We assess the claim that nineteenth-century periodicals succeeded in creating, through a “transauthorial discourse” (Klancher 1987), a unified corporate voice that hid individual authors behind an impersonal public text. This paper will examine the following questions:

Can we “operationalise” (Moretti 2013) the practice of authorship in the Edinburgh Review, selecting textual features that can be measured empirically with methods such as stylometry, corpus stylistics and Natural Language Processing?

Which aspects of authorship are brought into focus through such a computational analysis of periodical literature? Which are instead elided, and must be recovered through other methods, such as close reading and archival research?

Finally, can we successfully combine computational methods and literary interpretation in “algorithmic criticism” (Ramsay 2011)? Do these “distant reading” methods represent an improvement, a complement or a distortion of research into Romantic periodicals and their practices?

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
A question of style: individual voices and corporate identity in the Edinburgh Review and Quarterly ReviewNot SetRSVP The Research Society for Victorian Periodicals
Keywords: stylometry; algorithmic criticism
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Arts and Humanities > English & Creative Writing
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Arts and Humanities
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Research Group: Digital Humanities at the Open University (DH_OU)
Item ID: 56394
Depositing User: David King
Date Deposited: 18 Sep 2018 13:10
Last Modified: 07 Aug 2019 09:54
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/56394
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU