The Open UniversitySkip to content

Contextualising the electronic management of assessment lifecycle in Bloomsbury

Havemann, Leo and Sherman, Sarah (2017). Contextualising the electronic management of assessment lifecycle in Bloomsbury. In: Havemann, Leo and Sherman, Sarah eds. Assessment, Feedback and Technology: Contexts and Case Studies in Bloomsbury. London, UK: Bloomsbury Learning Environment, pp. 5–13.

Full text available as:
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (852kB) | Preview
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


[Book synopsis]

In 2014, the Bloomsbury Learning Environment (BLE) Consortium initiated a wide-ranging, two-year-long research and dissemination project focusing on the use of technology in assessment and feedback. Our aim was to understand and improve processes, practices, opportunities and tools available to the institutional members of the BLE Consortium. From the project, we produced three research papers investigating current practice and 21 case studies describing both technology-enabled pedagogy and technical development. Now presented as a free ebook, co-edited by Leo Havemann and Sarah Sherman, we offer the flavour of the variety and breadth of the BLE?s activities relating to the project theme as a contribution to the education sector?s widening conversation about the interplay of assessment, feedback, pedagogy and technology.

Item Type: Book Section
Keywords: assessment, feedback, learning and teaching, technology-enhanced learning, bloomsbury colleges, higher education
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 56372
Depositing User: Leo Havemann
Date Deposited: 28 Sep 2018 09:08
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2019 04:19
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU